Google chrome ad blocker extension plus#

Google sent me a statement over email, which reads: 'We're happy to see Mozilla supporting Manifest V3, which is intended to make extensions safer for everyone. Ghostery CEO Jean-Paul Schmetz told tech site the Verge: “While Google is pushing a ‘privacy by design’ message on the surface, it’s still asserting a monopoly over the entire ecosystem by stifling digital privacy companies that are already working to give users back control of their data.” Manifest V3 “is another example of the inherent conflict of interest that comes from Google controlling both the dominant web browser and one of the largest internet advertising networks,” the EFF said.Īd blockers such as Ghostery have been vocal about how the changes will affect their extensions. So much so that privacy advocates the EFF called Chrome’s Manifest V3 “ deceitful and threatening.” Content blocking is one of the most important use cases for extensions, and we are committed to ensuring that Firefox users have access to the best privacy tools available.” We will continue to work with content blockers and other key consumers of this API to identify current and future alternatives where appropriate. To maximize compatibility with other browsers, we will also ship support for declarativeNetRequest. “Mozilla will maintain support for blocking WebRequest in MV3. However, this will limit the capabilities of certain types of privacy extensions without adequate replacement. Unfortunately, that power has also been used to harm users in a variety of ways Chrome’s solution in MV3 was to define a more narrowly scoped API (declarativeNetRequest) as a replacement. These include being transparent and not passing off ads as content, as well as not using overly large and obnoxious advertisements that distort web pages.“One of the most controversial changes of Chrome’s MV3 approach is the removal of blocking WebRequest, which provides a level of power and flexibility that is critical to enabling advanced privacy and content blocking features.

Google chrome ad blocker extension plus#

Adblock Plus does whitelist other smaller websites for free, though, so long as they meet its criteria. Eyeo claims Adblock Plus has been downloaded 300 million times, and these tech giants' actions just prove that they're at least a bit worried that it will affect their business. While Adblock Plus' developer, German company Eyeo, doesn't list its fees anywhere, a digital media company that talked to FT said Eyeo asks for 30 percent of the ad revenues that would otherwise not exist. While what these companies are doing might not sit well with some Adblock Plus users, it's not bribery and is entirely legal. Adblock Plus, as you might know, is a popular Chrome and Firefox extension that blocks ads: as such, some websites that rely on advertisements for revenue haven't been too happy with it, with a handful of German publishers taking the service to court. Now, Financial Times says that it's not only Google that's been paying the ad-blocking service to be part of its whitelisted websites, but also Microsoft, Amazon and ad platform Taboola. It's long been rumored that Google, among other companies, has been paying Adblock Plus in order to get through its filters.